Railton-Meeks provides specialist block management services for Resident Management Companies, freeholders, and directors across Manchester and Greater Manchester — covering buildings ranging from converted Victorian conversions to modern apartment developments. Our service includes acting as the professional Accountable Person under the Building Safety Act 2022, managing the digital Golden Thread of statutory safety records, full service charge accounting under the 2026 RICS Service Charge Residential Management Code, and the operational management of communal areas, maintenance contracts, and resident relations.
With ARLA Propertymark membership, twenty years of Manchester property stewardship, and a compliance-first operating model built specifically for the post-Grenfell regulatory landscape, we shield RMC directors and freeholders from personal-liability exposure while protecting the long-term value of the asset.
Block management is a fundamentally different service from residential lettings.
The client is not a landlord with a property to let — the client is a Resident Management Company, a freeholder, or a building’s directors, with a statutory duty to maintain communal areas, manage building safety, and account transparently for the service charges contributed by leaseholders.
Railton-Meeks operates block management for clients who recognise this and who want a professional, regulated, accountable agent managing the work on their behalf.
The 2026 regulatory environment has made this work more complex than at any point in modern memory.
The Building Safety Act 2022 has created a new statutory framework with named individuals carrying personal liability. Service charge transparency has tightened. Resident-engagement obligations have expanded. Insurance markets have hardened.
Above all, the cost of getting block management wrong — to leaseholders, to tenants, to the building’s long-term value, and to the directors personally — has risen materially.
The Building Safety Act 2022 is the most significant change to the legal framework governing residential blocks since the Grenfell Tower fire of 2017. It creates a statutory regulatory regime for higher-risk buildings, names specific individuals as legally accountable for safety, and introduces civil and criminal penalties for failures of compliance.
For RMCs and freeholders managing buildings within scope, the Act imposes obligations that did not exist five years ago — including:
The Building Safety Regulator established within the Health and Safety Executive, with enforcement powers including improvement notices, prohibition notices, civil penalties, and criminal prosecution.
Higher-Risk Buildings are defined as residential buildings of seven storeys or more, or 18 metres or more in height, containing at least two dwellings. HRBs must be registered with the BSR and managed under the Act's full statutory regime.
The Accountable Person is the legal entity (often the freeholder or RMC) statutorily responsible for managing building safety risks. The Accountable Person must produce a Safety Case Report, submit it to the BSR, and maintain it throughout the life of the building.
Where multiple Accountable Persons exist for different parts of a building, one is designated as Principal, with overarching coordination responsibility.
The Resident Engagement Strategy is a documented plan for engaging residents on safety matters, with a route for residents to raise concerns and receive responses.
Mandatory Occurrence Reporting mandates that any safety occurrence that could cause significant risk must be reported to the BSR within statutory timeframes.
These are not policy preferences. They are legal duties carrying personal liability for the named individuals.
The most significant operational change introduced by the Building Safety Act 2022 is the concept of the Accountable Person — a legal entity (or individual where the entity is itself a person) who is statutorily responsible for managing building safety risks in higher-risk buildings.
For Resident Management Companies, the Accountable Person is typically the RMC itself — meaning the directors are personally engaged in the legal duties imposed. For freeholder-managed buildings, the freeholder is typically the Accountable Person, with similar individual exposure for the named directors of the freeholder company.
The Accountable Person’s duties include:
These are not duties that can be delegated away — but they can be operationally managed by a professional block management agency working on the Accountable Person’s behalf. Railton-Meeks acts as the professional partner managing the day-to-day execution of these duties for the named Accountable Person. The legal duty remains with the named individual or entity. The operational burden moves to us.
This is the central distinction between informal management and professional block management in 2026.
Block Management at Railton-Meeks is a comprehensive service covering every operational, financial, regulatory, and resident-facing element of running a residential block. Below is a complete breakdown — built specifically for the 2026 regulatory environment and designed to support RMC directors and freeholders managing buildings of any scale.
The Building Safety Act 2022’s most operationally significant requirement is the Digital Golden Thread — a structured, accessible, continuously-updated digital record of safety-critical building information that must be maintained for the life of every higher-risk building.
In practice, the Golden Thread is a comprehensive digital archive containing the building’s design and construction information, fire safety strategy, structural assessments, materials specifications, maintenance records, modification history, and inspection findings — organised in a way that allows the Accountable Person, the Building Safety Regulator, and (where appropriate) residents to access the information rapidly and reliably.
For most RMCs and freeholders, building this Golden Thread from scratch is the single most operationally significant compliance task they face. The information often exists, but scattered across paper files, multiple consultants’ reports, individual director’s email archives, and historic documentation that may pre-date the current ownership. Compiling, structuring, and digitising it is a substantial professional undertaking.
Railton-Meeks treats the Golden Thread as a core deliverable of our Block Management service. We build it once, properly, with the structure the Building Safety Regulator specifically expects to see — and we maintain it continuously throughout the management relationship. This is the differentiating service that separates Manchester block management firms operating in the post-Grenfell regulatory landscape from firms still managing as they did in 2018.
These are not duties that can be delegated away — but they can be operationally managed by a professional block management agency working on the Accountable Person’s behalf. Railton-Meeks acts as the professional partner managing the day-to-day execution of these duties for the named Accountable Person. The legal duty remains with the named individual or entity. The operational burden moves to us.
This is the central distinction between informal management and professional block management in 2026.
Service charge transparency is the second area where the regulatory environment has tightened materially since 2018. The 2026 RICS Service Charge Residential Management Code, the Leasehold Reform (Ground Rent) Act 2022, and the strengthening of Section 21 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 have all combined to raise the bar on what RMCs and freeholders are expected to deliver to leaseholders.
For each block under our management, we deliver:
Transparency is not a marketing claim. It is a statutory expectation, and the work we do for our clients is built around delivering it consistently.
We manage buildings of varying sizes, ages, and tenures across Manchester — from small Victorian conversions with three or four flats through to modern purpose-built developments with dozens of apartments. Below are the building types most commonly under our management.
Smaller buildings — often 3 to 12 flats — converted from large period townhouses, typically across South Manchester (Didsbury, Withington, Chorlton). Lower-rise, generally outside the Higher-Risk Building threshold, but with their own complexity around structural age, lease portfolio fragmentation, and historic maintenance records. We manage many such buildings on behalf of small RMCs.
Buildings constructed since 2000 — including Salford Quays, MediaCityUK, and city-centre developments. Often within Higher-Risk Building scope (above 18 metres), with full Building Safety Act regulatory exposure. Managed buildings typically range from 30 to 120+ units, with the operational complexity of lifts, communal heating, cladding considerations, and concierge or security functions.
Buildings combining residential apartments above ground-floor commercial premises, common across Manchester city centre. These create a distinct regulatory and insurance landscape, with separate fire safety considerations and often more complex service charge apportionment between commercial and residential tenants.
If your building doesn’t fit neatly into one of these categories — perhaps a recent retrofit, a hotel-conversion residence, or an unusual mixed-tenure structure — we’d be happy to talk. Manchester has a complex architectural heritage and we’ve worked across most of it.
Block management is a regulated, technical specialism. The agency you appoint determines the personal liability profile of your directors, the financial transparency of your service charge, and the long-term value of your building. The decision merits the rigour of a procurement exercise rather than a price-led comparison.
| Service Feature | Tenant Finder | Tenant Finder Plus | Let Only | Fully Managed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Setup & Marketing | ||||
| Rental valuation & legislation advice | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Advice on achieving highest rent | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Safety certificates & compliance | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| To Let board | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Online portal advertising (Rightmove, Zoopla) | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Proactive marketing | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tenant Onboarding | ||||
| Accompanied viewings (including evenings) | — | — | ✓ | ✓ |
| Contracts & inventory preparation | — | — | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tenant referencing | — | — | £25 per person | £25 per person |
| Right to Rent checks | — | — | ✓ | ✓ |
| Deposit administration | — | — | ✓ | ✓ |
| Council tax liaison | — | — | ✓ | ✓ |
| Full photographic inventory (setup) | — | — | ✓ | ✓ |
| Ongoing Management | ||||
| Rent collection | — | — | ✓ | ✓ |
| Monthly rent payments to landlord | — | — | ✓ | ✓ |
| Full management statement | — | — | ✓ | ✓ |
| Property inspections (twice yearly) | — | — | ✓ | ✓ |
| Utilities administration | — | — | — | ✓ |
| Preparing property for re-let | — | — | — | ✓ |
| Strategic Advice | ||||
| Trades, investment & HMO advice | — | — | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing | ||||
| Setup fee | £250one-time | £350one-time | £650*one-time | No setup fee |
| Ongoing management | — | — | — | 14.5%of rent received |
| Re-letting fee | — | — | £250 | £250 |
| Service Feature | Tenant Finder | Tenant Finder Plus | Let Only | Fully Managed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Setup & Marketing | ||||
| Rental valuation & legislation advice | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Advice on achieving highest rent | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Safety certificates & compliance | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| To Let board | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Online portal advertising (Rightmove, Zoopla) | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Proactive marketing | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tenant Onboarding | ||||
| Accompanied viewings (including evenings) | — | — | ✓ | ✓ |
| Contracts & inventory preparation | — | — | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tenant referencing | — | — | £25 per person | £25 per person |
| Right to Rent checks | — | — | ✓ | ✓ |
| Deposit administration | — | — | ✓ | ✓ |
| Council tax liaison | — | — | ✓ | ✓ |
| Full photographic inventory (setup) | — | — | ✓ | ✓ |
| Ongoing Management | ||||
| Rent collection | — | — | ✓ | ✓ |
| Monthly rent payments to landlord | — | — | ✓ | ✓ |
| Full management statement | — | — | ✓ | ✓ |
| Property inspections (twice yearly) | — | — | ✓ | ✓ |
| Utilities administration | — | — | — | ✓ |
| Preparing property for re-let | — | — | — | ✓ |
| Strategic Advice | ||||
| Trades, investment & HMO advice | — | — | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing | ||||
| Setup fee | £250one-time | £350one-time | £650*one-time | No setup fee |
| Ongoing management | — | — | — | 14.5%of rent received |
| Re-letting fee | — | — | £250 | £250 |
£250 one-time setup
£350 one-time setup
£650* one-time setup
14.5% of rent received
* Let only fee is one month’s rent, subject to a minimum fee of £650
All fees are exclusive of VAT. Tenant referencing at £25 per person covers credit, employment, and previous landlord checks for each named applicant. The £150 re-letting fee on Let Only and Fully Managed properties covers full re-marketing when an existing tenancy ends and a new tenant is required.
Twenty years of landlord referrals. ARLA-qualified throughout. Compliance-first by design.
The benefits a portfolio landlord notices in the first six months of working with us:
The questions Manchester RMC directors and freeholders ask before instructing us.
Residential property management deals with individual landlords letting properties to tenants. Block management deals with the communal management of an entire building on behalf of its leaseholders, RMC, or freeholder. Different statutory framework, different client structure, different compliance regime. Most letting agents do not offer block management. We do, as a distinct specialism.
Block management fees are calculated property-specifically because the workload varies materially by building size, complexity, regulatory status (HRB or non-HRB), and the level of director engagement preferred. Fees are typically charged on a per-unit basis or as a flat annual fee, depending on the building. We provide tailored quotes after a property visit and lease review.
The Accountable Person is the legal entity (or individual) statutorily responsible for managing building safety risks in higher-risk buildings under the Building Safety Act 2022. For most Manchester RMCs, the RMC itself is the Accountable Person, meaning the directors are personally engaged in the duties. We act as the professional partner managing the operational execution of those duties on behalf of the named Accountable Person.
A residential building of seven storeys or more, or 18 metres or more in height, containing at least two dwellings. HRBs are subject to the full Building Safety Act regulatory regime, including BSR registration, Safety Case Reports, Resident Engagement Strategies, and Mandatory Occurrence Reporting. Many Manchester city-centre and Salford Quays buildings are HRBs. Most South Manchester Victorian conversions are not.
The structured digital record of safety-critical building information that the Building Safety Act requires Accountable Persons to maintain for the life of higher-risk buildings. It includes design information, fire safety strategy, structural assessments, materials specifications, maintenance records, and inspection findings — organised so the Accountable Person, the Building Safety Regulator, and residents can access it reliably. Building it from scratch is the single most operationally significant compliance task most RMCs face. We do this as a core deliverable.
Yes. The transition involves transfer of service charge accounts, reserve funds, building documentation, supplier contracts, and ongoing maintenance arrangements. We handle the full handover process directly with the outgoing agent. Most transitions complete within 60 days with no disruption to leaseholders or service delivery.
The formal consultation process required under Section 20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 before an RMC or freeholder can recover (through service charges) the cost of major works above £250 per leaseholder, or qualifying long-term agreements above £100 per leaseholder per year. Failing to consult correctly limits recoverable costs to those statutory caps. We manage Section 20 consultations as standard for any qualifying works.
Yes. Tara personally attends RMC director meetings and AGMs for every block under our management. Quarterly director check-ins, annual AGMs, and ad-hoc meetings on significant matters are all included as standard. We don't believe block management is a relationship that should be conducted entirely by email.
Yes. Annual buildings insurance review and renewal is included as standard. We typically work alongside the building's existing broker — or where appropriate, run a tendering exercise to ensure the cover and premium remain competitive. The Building Safety Act has materially affected the insurance market for HRBs, and active broker engagement is now significantly more important than it was three years ago.
Through a documented internal process with clear timeframes for response and escalation. Where a complaint cannot be resolved internally, leaseholders have the right to escalate to The Property Ombudsman, and ultimately to the First-Tier Tribunal (Property Chamber). We are members of The Property Ombudsman scheme and operate to its complaint-handling standards.
Every HMO Management instruction begins with a property-specific conversation — typically with Tara directly, often at the property itself. She’ll review your licensing position, your Article 4 status, your current yield, and your operational setup, and give you a clear, honest view of where the gaps and opportunities are.
The conversation costs nothing, commits you to nothing, and is genuinely useful regardless of who ends up managing the property.